Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion. Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia.

نویسندگان

  • B E Cohen
  • M B Hartman
  • J T Wade
  • J S Miller
  • R Gilbert
  • T M Chapman
چکیده

STUDY DESIGN A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of postoperative continuous epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Controversy remains regarding the optimal strategy for postoperative pain control. METHODS Fifty-four patients were divided into two treatment groups. There was no difference between the groups with respect to age, levels fused, estimated blood loss, and use of spinal instrumentation. Patient-controlled analgesia or epidural analgesia was administered in a double-blind manner for a 3-day postoperative course. Each patient received both an epidural and a patient-controlled analgesia delivery system; 26 received the epidural active agent and 28 received patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative time to liquids and solid food, ambulation, length of stay, and side effects was recorded. Pain was evaluated by a visual analog scale on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. RESULTS Results showed no difference between the groups with reference to diet, ambulation, length of stay, and visual analog scale scores. Minor side effects occurred in 71% of patients in both groups. No major complications occurred. Epidural catheter dislodgment occurred in 11% of patients. The total cost for epidural analgesia was approximately $550 more than that for patient-controlled analgesia for a 3-day postoperative course. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that there is no clinical advantage of epidural opiate/local anesthetic analgesia over systemic opiate by patient-controlled analgesia for spinal fusion patients. However, possible technical limitations (namely, the low dosage of bupivacaine and placement of the catheter tip) may have prevented adequate delivery of anesthetic to the involved segments. Although the incidence of side effects is similar, cost factors and a high incidence of epidural catheter dislodgment favor use of patient-controlled analgesia.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain control after lumbar spine surgery.

Spine surgery remains one of the most common procedures for patients with a wide variety of spine disorders. Postoperative pain after major spine surgery is moderate to severe. We retrospectively reviewed 245 medical records of adult patients undergoing major spine surgery who received either patient-controlled epidural analgesia based on local anesthetics and opioids or patient-controlled intr...

متن کامل

Patient-controlled postoperative analgesia: comparison of efficacy, side-effects and safety of various regimens

Contents 6 7 This dissertation is based on the following original publications, which will be referred to in the text by their Roman numerals I-V. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of oxycodone and morphine in postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Efficacy and side effects of tramadol versus oxycodone for patient-controlled analgesia after maxillofacial surgery. Comparison of i...

متن کامل

Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids: a meta-analysis.

The authors performed a meta-analysis and found that epidural analgesia overall provided superior postoperative analgesia compared with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. For all types of surgery and pain assessments, all forms of epidural analgesia (both continuous epidural infusion and patient-controlled epidural analgesia) provided significantly superior postoperative analgesia compar...

متن کامل

Preemptive Caudal Ropivacaine: An Effective Analgesic during Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comprising 60 patients undergoing lumbosacral spine (noninstrumentation/nonfusion) surgery. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.2% ropivacaine (20 mL) administered alone as a single, preoperative, caudal epidural block injection versus that of intravenous analgesics in providing effective postope...

متن کامل

Multimodal Pain Management Protocol Versus Patient Controlled Narcotic Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control after Shoulder Arthroplasty

  Background: Our institution’s traditional pain management strategy after shoulder arthroplasty has involved the utilization of postoperative patient-controlled narcotic analgesia. More recently, we have implemented a protocol (TLC) that utilizes a multimodal approach. The purpose of this study was to determine whether this change has improved pain control and decreased narcotic utilization. ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Spine

دوره 22 16  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1997